Subaru Impreza GC8 & RS Forum & Community banner

Big fsb, no rsb?

5.4K views 44 replies 19 participants last post by  aesthetect  
#1 ·
I've been scheming over preparing my L for FSP next season and in doing so I was reading some old threads here. On numerous occasions OmahaSubaru mentioned using no swaybars and lots of spring, but many people questioned his logic because of our infamous camber curve.

Somewhere else I read or was told (I can't cite it because I have no idea where I heard it) that when running r-comps on a Subaru they tend to rotate better with the RSB disconnected due to the added grip. This could be totally wrong, but I remember it.

The common trend here is no RSB.

So my question is in theory, "Can one have their cake and eat it to?" or better yet, "Can one experience the benefits of a large FSB and the added 'rotaionability' :mamoru: of no RSB without negatively affecting handling?"

The application would be my eL which already has no RSB. Other bits that will be used are the obvious SP mods such as coilovers, camber plates, r-comps, yadda, yadda, yadda...
 
#2 · (Edited)
What I've found is that the roll we get is pretty substantial until the car is lowered enough to physically limit it....but that also brings geometry issues along with it. A BIG FSB will limit roll no matter what height you are (within reason) and allow the (front) camber to stay in a more desirable area. The rear end likes very little camber because any roll that we end up with will put the outside tire out on it's edge and contribute to rotation. Naturally, you have to balance it with spring rates so you aren't wallowing around or even worse, lifting the inside front wheel (yes, it can happen in an Impreza). I prefer to run less bar in the back (or no bar) and very little camber to get my rotation without lifting a rear wheel and hurting forward bite on corner exit.

My FSP Brighton has a very neutral feel to it with low steering inputs. I've gotten it dialed to the point that if I want rotation, I simply add more steering input while keeping steady on the gas....or tap the brake just prior to turn-in. I can pretty much bring the tail around at will, but I have to remember that I don't have the power to pull me out of a slide if I let it go too far. I also have to make sure I know my arc going into a corner. Midcorner corrections to the inside get sketchy, but more often than not, I can get to the inside without instigating a drift. Daily driving the car helps me stay in-tune with the traits. I don't run bars at either end and developed this setup for 13" wheels. When we run the bigger 15's (275-35-15), we have to raise the car 1/2" and the extra grip is enough to roll it over more than I'd like. I added 1/2 degree of negative camber (about -1.5) in the rear to balance things out, but will be trying the stock 19mm bar up front again to see if I can limit the roll to where it was. I'm still learning the limits of the tires, as it is way higher than the 13" Hankooks. I'd love to try a set of 255-40-13 Hoosiers back to back with the 275-35-15 and gauge which is better overall for my setup.

Did I even come close to answering your question? he he he......
 
#5 ·
Jay, you delivered as usual. Thank you.

Sleepy, if you do please report back! I'm not familiar with your setup though and you haven't posted it in the autox setup thread.

n2x4, I had a Tribeca FSB in mind.

Looking through the autox setup thread I noticed that Omaha is also running a larger FSB and on RSB too, as of last year. It looks like I'm not the first person to think of this :lol:
 
#6 ·
I resisted the no bar setup for a long time....I dunno if I was stubbron, stupid or both....but the 1st year we ran Nationals at heartland park, our DSP car was so stiff, we had very little grip. Stupid of me for not even trying to disconnect the bars just to see what would happen.....With the FSp car, I just wanted to try something different. No bars works really good when the CG is low enough, as 13" wheels will allow.

I can definately see the benefits in a big Tribeca bar and small or no rear bar. You might have to address the differentials to take full advantage of the setup....but it's very much worth it.
 
#7 ·
I have the tribeca 25mm front bar on my 95L and a 20mm rear FHI bar and the handeling was negativly affected by this change. I had a stock 19mm front and the 20mm in the back and it was a dream. The 25mm in my opinion is just way to big and hurts grip. At my AutoX events I noticed a 3-4 sec difference from the 19mm bar and the 25mm. With the 19mm bar my speed into a sharp corner could be higher and i could maintain that speed. With the 25mm the car wanted to pull way outside, and wash out. However with the 25mm bar my slaom speed was higher.
 
#12 ·
Here are some pics illustrating my points earlier. These first two show big bars at both ends, but the camber is set so that any roll we get is going to keep the front tire at max grip, while letting the rear roll out onto it's edge. Note the wheel lift as well.


These are with no bars and small wheels. Note the car still doesn't roll over that much, but the front is standing nice and flat while the rear end stays pretty planted too.


Here's one showing the controllable oversteer during a corner exit (cooked tires played a roll in this pic too)....


And finally where we're at with alot of grip, still no bars, and still a little too high.

A couple pics from 2008 Nationals....browse the full album.
http://mageep.smugmug.com/photos/380107613_8JyR3-XL.jpg
http://mageep.smugmug.com/gallery/6014068_RyHmn#380129947_vocM2-X2-LB
 
#15 ·
That's because you didn't have a big front bar.

The fastest subie in my area runs 27-29mm front with 13mm rear... I'm fairly certain that at those rates, you could just lose the rear sway completely and not even notice...

-- Dave
 
#24 ·
Is it a completely different setup for track racing/driving?

I was talking to a guy at the local subaru shop about an STI that they sponsor that was in the shop and he mentioned that the setup is a lot different on the track. On that STI they were running a large RSB but they put the stock STI FSB on because it handled better like that.

Seems completely against what is true in this thread, but then again its a completely different type of driving
 
#27 · (Edited)
This thread got me thinking. I might remove my rear strut tower bar first, and then try the OEM rear bar again (if needed). With the Tribeca bar in front, I have so much grip up front that the rear has trouble behaving in slaloms and quick transitions (have 20mm WRX bar in rear now). I only have the SPT wagon pink springs, which are in the 200# range, so "no rear bar" is probably out, but smaller sounds directionally correct.
 
#28 ·
This sounds rather backwards from what I've learned about suspension tuning. I could summarize what I think is happening, but instead could the well-informed shed some light on the general theory of running a setup like this?

i.e. camber/caster/toe, spring rates, damping, tire type, tire pressures, chassis alterations (braces/bushings/geometry changes), as well as driving techniques, etc. I am not trying to expose any secret recipes, but general methodology would help it make more sense.
 
#31 · (Edited)
I have been extremely happy with my 25mm front bar from Addco, but they only make a 24mm bar now. The car turns in nicely, but like said early, it does have a slight habit of washing out on corner exit... nothing that can't be overcome though. Keep in mind, this is on street tires too.... so I am kind of the lone wolf compared to the super fast DSP/FSP guys. Clearence is pretty tight with the 25mm bar, but a 27mm solid should be able to fit with the right bends, etc...

For what it's worth, I am on 8k/6k coils with 25mm front bar and 20mm rear bar, and stock bushings ( for now at least ). I am planning on lowering the car quite a bit over the holidays and going with a better alignment, so we will see how this works out next season.