since all of you are idiots, i will chime in.
i'm just kidding, but now that you have me attention:
first of all, ryan has 2 names. i know, he's a moderator and so many he gets special priveledges....but still...2 names. one for irvine and one for ryaneatworld.
therefore, to make things fair, i declare that sean's second name be:
seaneatworld. and if fishguy has a problem with that, he can delete ryan's second name too. i don't feel that a person should have to drag their whole company into a discussion just because their name is listed as part of their screen name. on the other hand, the vendor name is sometimes necessary to announce vendor news or specials. i feel vendors should all be allowed to have 2 names, as long as it is clear that one name is a vendor and one is a private name. personally i respect whatever ryan or sean have to say, no matter what name they post under. but not everyone feels like i do, and i would hate for: 1. the vendors to shy away from posting their real feelings for fear of getting in trouble with their employer or: 2. the private screen name will not command as much respect as a "vendor" screen name would, and people would be less likely to take them seriously when they are distributing vendor information.
this is about being fair and letting the 2 entities, vendor business and personal freedom, remain as 2 seperate entities. and if "seaneatworld" is not an acceptable screen name, my second choice would be "sean m."
thank you for your consideration of my vastly superior ideas.
note: any or all spelling errors in this post are in honor of [email protected], banval4life, tommi mackinen, and TMRRALLY, and were strictly intentional.